Argus Argoflex E Review

To see images shot with this camera, click the category link at right.

The art-deco bakelite-bodied Argus Argoflex E was made in Ann Arbor, Michigan from 1940 to 1948. It’s a cute little twin-lens reflex camera, with a gear-focusing front element lens similar to the Ricohflex. But based on my first roll of film through the Argoflex, the lens isn’t as good as the Ricohflex.  I’ll add some photos of the camera and more information about it soon.  It’s a fun little camera – nice and light; real focusing (unlike the psuedo-TLRs like the Duoflex from Kodak), 1/10 – 1/200 sec shutter, plus B and T; f/4.5 to f/18 75mm lens.  It’s made for 620 film, but a nice thing about it is that 120 spools will fit. In the take-up spool position, the 120 spool is a bit tight in mine, so winding the film takes some force. But the supply spool area holds a 120 spool nice and loosely, so even though it seems like you’re forcing it to wind, the film shouldn’t be under any stress or extra tension.  I ran my first roll through with a 120 roll of film in the supply side (bottom of camera) and an old 620 spool in the take-up position just to make sure things went smoothly.  It’s easy to come by 620 spools if you find some old brownie cameras at rummage sales (they’ll usually have one spool left in the camera from the last roll of film shot), and you can just ask your processor to return the spools to you.  I haven’t lost one yet.

Shooting my first roll of film in the Argoflex, I found that the lens produces very low-contrast images.  I had to boost the contrast significantly in Lightroom, but was able to get decent images out of it.  They have a slight softness to them that’s kind of nice.

This particular camera is a post-WWII version, which you can tell because the earlier models had a small knob on the left side below the viewfinder, where on this model there’s simply a decorative circle.

Aperture is set with the silver pointer. Rather odd aperture settings of f/4.5, 6.3, 9, 12.7, 18

Shutter speed is set with the silver dial. Speeds of 1/10 to 1/200 sec, plus B (bulb) and T (time). T opens the shutter on the first shutter click and keeps it open 'til you click it again. Shutter lever requires no cocking, just push down.

View looking down at the viewfinder with focus magnifier flipped up

Nice ten-blade aperture

Even though the film-counter window has a red window, it also has a solid door to completely block out light, which swings open using the lever under it. The two silver tabs at the top of the door open the back.

The swing-out holder where the take-up spool goes. I can fit a 120 spool in here, but it's a little snug. The supply spool area on the bottom has plenty of space for a 120 spool.

The bakelite-bodied Argoflex E (left, 1940-1948) next to the metal-bodied Argoflex EF (1948-1951)

Size difference of film spools: left: 620 spool, center: old metal 120 spool, right: modern plastic 120 spool.

Left: 620, Right: 120

14 Comments on “Argus Argoflex E Review”

  1. rumtea says:

    Hi, 🙂
    I am new to this camera and I am trying to find a film to test it out. Do you think this kind of film is good? Thanks!
    Kodak Ektar 100

  2. Nha Hoan Le says:

    I test out 2 rolls of film already, one color and one B&W. I found the view finder is extremely hard to use. I barely see anything through it. Especially in the dim light. I wonder is it any way we can clean the glass inside the camera.

  3. A Photographer says:

    Um. I don’t know what a Lightroom is exactly, but I develop film myself and create images from the negatives in a darkroom on an enlarger sooo….I don’t know if that’s like a different countries thing? But that’s what it’s called in America…if somebody can tell me what a Lightroom is I’d love to know! 🙂

    Otherwise this was super helpful in teaching about my new TLR 🙂

    • Rick Schuster says:

      Glad to hear some of you are still printing in the darkroom. I’ve gotten lazy — my darkroom has been packed away in boxes for years, and has been replaced by film scans, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, and inkjet printers.

  4. Mark Kurtz says:

    You reference that the camera will take only 620 sized film (although you point out that you can “squeeze” a 120 roll into the camera) You also mention that the earlier versions of this camera (mid-1946 and earlier) has a small knob on the left side below the viewfinder (which is what catches the other end of the film spool) The other difference of the earlier model is that it also takes 120 film as well as the 620 – the later models (post 1946, like yours) will take only 620. I have one of the earlier models – it was given to my dad by his parents, my grandparents, when he returned from World War 2 and he let me first use it in the mid/late 60s It was my first real camera and I still have it. I work as a professional photographer so you can imagine this camera has a great value to me.

    Thank you for your review! By the way – in addition to digital, I still use film, including printing in the darkroom…although I haven’s shot on the Argoflex in quite a number of years.

    • Rick Schuster says:

      Thanks for the info, Mark. That’s good to know that the earlier model was built for 120, not 620. I should put another roll through this camera.
      Great work, by the way. I love your wide landscapes. Do you shoot those on film or digital?

      • Mark Kurtz says:

        Actually, from what I’ve read, the early models of the Argoflex E will take both 120 and 620 – the later models (like yours) will only take 620 (although apparently you can “squeeze” in the 120 roll – if you can get ahold of some 620 spools, you can re-spool 120 onto 620 spools – it fits – and run the film in the camera without the difficulty of having to advance the film with significant effort)

        Thank you for your comments on my wide landscape (panorama) images – those are shot on film – I use a Fuji 617, one of the early models – later models offer changeable lenses but the one I use has a single fixed lens – 105mm, which is “normal” for this format – the negative is 2 1/4 x 6 3/4 – I have to print with a 5×7 enlarger. The images on the web site are scans of course, to digitize them for things like the web site…once digitized I can make ink-jet prints, which I do, as well as the darkroom silver prints.

        • Rick Schuster says:

          I think the Fuji 617 would be a great camera. That huge neg must be amazing. I love that you still do darkroom prints as well as scanning. It’s great to see you putting that camera to such good use.

  5. John Carlo Cantilang says:

    whats the dimension of the camera??? pls reply asap

  6. Luis Peralta says:

    Hi, I have one, but I unknow how to use, so I decided to sell It,can someone give an idea how much can i sell it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s